Categories
Saved web pages

Munich Security Conference Chairman: Russia might attack NATO

Christoph Heusgen. Stock photo: Christoph Heusgen on Twitter (Х)
Christoph Heusgen. Stock photo: Christoph Heusgen on Twitter (Х)

Munich Security Conference Chairman Christoph Heusgen has said it is possible that Russia might attack a NATO member-state.

Source: European Pravda, with reference to dpa, a German news agency

Details: When asked whether Russian President Vladimir Putin could order an attack on a NATO state, Heusgen replied: “Of course. After all, Putin said on multiple occasions that the collapse of the Soviet Union was the greatest catastrophe of the 20th century, because it left a lot of Russians outside of Russia.”

Heusgen also said that “Putin wanted to restore Great Russia within the borders of the nonexistent Soviet Union, a global empire in which he would rule like a Tsar”.

Heusgen said Putin could target Moldova or the Baltic States.

He refused to speculate whether Putin was really capable of it, but said that “we have to do everything we can to ensure Ukraine gets the weapons and military aid it needs to successfully oppose the Russian aggressors and expel them from its territory”.

Background:

  • Boris Pistorius, Federal Minister of Defence of Germany, said that Russia might attack a NATO country in the next 5-8 years.

  • The Commander-in-Chief of the Swedish Armed Forces, Mikael Büden, and the Minister of Civil Defence, Karl Oscar Bolin, said that all Swedish citizens should be prepared for war.

  • Commander-in-Chief of the Norwegian Armed Forces, General Eirik Kristoffersen, believes that his country has little time left to increase defence production to be able to withstand Russia’s aggression.

Support UP or become our patron!

Categories
(@mikenov) / Twitter

@mikenov: Moscow says the US “seeks to consolidate its presence in the South Caucasus”

Categories
Saved web pages

Moscow says the US “seeks to consolidate its presence in the South Caucasus”

premium_l.jpg
Categories
(@mikenov) / Twitter

@mikenov: https://t.co/DHa2n9brjE – The News And Times Review https://t.co/O0SIgLVWzM #NewsAndTimes #NT #TNT #News #Times #World #USA #POTUS #DOJ #FBI #CIA #DIA #ODNI #Israel #Mossad #Netanyahu #Ukraine #NewAbwehr #OSINT #Putin #Russia #GRU #Путин, #Россия https://t.co/DO5LG3PY4T… https://t.co/Xc4m9CuX5a

Categories
(@mikenov) / Twitter

@mikenov: U.S. Rejects Putin’s Latest Call for Ukraine Negotiations https://t.co/UhMHEsib8x

Categories
The News And Times Blog

U.S. Rejects Putin’s Latest Call for Ukraine Negotiations

 

Selected Articles – The News And Times

Watch again: Hong Kong celebrates Chinese New Year with spectacular parade
Hong Kong celebrates the New Year of the Dragon with a colorful parade on the first day of the Lunar New Year. Together with other popular Chinese New Year elements, such as blooming flowers, felicitous couplets, lucky windmills and firecrackers, the colourfully adorned floats bring to the parade diverse interpretations of the New Year with various…
 

U.S. Rejects Putin’s Latest Call for Ukraine Negotiations
SKIP ADVERTISEMENTPhotosUkraine Goes on DefenseE.U. Deal to Fund UkraineUkraine’s Combat MedicsHow Russia Silences DissentSkepticism remains high about the Russian leader’s intentions after he told Tucker Carlson that the war in Ukraine could be settled with a peace deal.Share full articleShare free access“Despite Mr. Putin’s words, we have seen no…
 

Former CIA analyst issues warning to Zelensky
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s firing of his commander-in-chief Valerii Zaluzhny is fraught with risk, a former CIA director has said, amid divided opinion over the wisdom of the decision and its impact on Kyiv’s fight against Russia.Tensions in the relationship between the pair had been reported in recent months. It intensified after Zaluzhny…
 
White House downplays Biden, national security aide’s blunt comments on Israel – Stars and Stripes
White House downplays Biden, national security aide’s blunt comments on Israel  Stars and Stripes
 
Netanyahu said to believe Israel has 1 month to finish Rafah operation amid global ire – The Times of Israel
Netanyahu said to believe Israel has 1 month to finish Rafah operation amid global ire  The Times of Israel
 
Netanyahu Downplays Moody’s Lowering Israel Credit Rating, Outlook – I24NEWS – i24NEWS
Netanyahu Downplays Moody’s Lowering Israel Credit Rating, Outlook – I24NEWS  i24NEWS
 
Israeli strikes kill 44 Palestinians in Rafah after Netanyahu says ground invasion is coming there – ABC News
Israeli strikes kill 44 Palestinians in Rafah after Netanyahu says ground invasion is coming there  ABC News
 
28 Palestinians killed in Israeli strikes in Rafah after Netanyahu says invasion there is inevitable – The Hill
28 Palestinians killed in Israeli strikes in Rafah after Netanyahu says invasion there is inevitable  The Hill
 
Israeli strikes kill 31 Palestinians in Rafah after Netanyahu says ground invasion is coming there – The Associated Press
Israeli strikes kill 31 Palestinians in Rafah after Netanyahu says ground invasion is coming there  The Associated Press
 
Israeli military kills 28 after Netanyahu signals Rafah invasion plan – Al Jazeera English
Israeli military kills 28 after Netanyahu signals Rafah invasion plan  Al Jazeera English
 
Palestine Presidency: ‘Netanyahu statements pose displacement threat’ – Middle East Monitor
Palestine Presidency: ‘Netanyahu statements pose displacement threat’  Middle East Monitor
 
‘My Brother’s Keeper’: Ex-Netanyahu aide comes clean about 2014 – review – The Jerusalem Post
‘My Brother’s Keeper’: Ex-Netanyahu aide comes clean about 2014 – review  The Jerusalem Post
 
Moody’s to Israel: It’s the Government, Stupid! – Israel News – Haaretz
Moody’s to Israel: It’s the Government, Stupid! – Israel News  Haaretz
 
Israeli strikes kill 31 Palestinians in Rafah after Netanyahu says ground invasion is coming there – WTOP
Israeli strikes kill 31 Palestinians in Rafah after Netanyahu says ground invasion is coming there  WTOP
 

Blinken’s cease-fire shuttle diplomacy crashes in Israel
ICYMI, Netanyahu has no interest in pausing war.
 

Biden hardens tone on Israel
Joe Biden’s tone on Israel has been hardening in recent days, but when he called the country’s response in the Gaza Strip “over the top” this week, the US president crossed into new territory.The comments made Thursday were the strongest by the US leader since Israel launched its barrage on Gaza following Hamas’ October 7 attacks — leaving the White…
 

Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh’s son reportedly killed in Israeli targeting
ALBAWABA – Hazem, the son of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh, was reportedly targeted by Israeli forces, according to Palestinian reports on Saturday…
 
The Senate is pushing past far-right objections to aiding Ukraine. But next steps are uncertain – WRIC ABC 8News
The Senate is pushing past far-right objections to aiding Ukraine. But next steps are uncertain  WRIC ABC 8News
 

NATO chief calls on Europe to ramp up arms production
BERLIN: NATO’s secretary general called on Europe to increase its arms production to support Ukraine and prevent “potentially decades of confrontation” with Moscow, in an interview published by German media Saturday. Ahead of a key meeting of NATO defense ministers in Brussels and the second anniversary of the Russia-Ukraine war, Jens Stoltenberg…
 

Israeli strikes on Gaza’s Rafah escalate fears of ground operation
GAZA STRIP, Palestinian Territories: Israeli air strikes pummeled densely crowded Rafah on Saturday after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ordered his troops to “prepare to operate” in the southern border city that has become a last refuge for displaced Palestinians. Netanyahu’s planned offensive on Rafah, where an estimated 1.3 million people have…
 
Categories
Saved web pages

U.S. Rejects Putin’s Latest Call for Ukraine Negotiations

  • Photos
  • Ukraine Goes on Defense
  • E.U. Deal to Fund Ukraine
  • Ukraine’s Combat Medics
  • How Russia Silences Dissent

Skepticism remains high about the Russian leader’s intentions after he told Tucker Carlson that the war in Ukraine could be settled with a peace deal.

  • Share full articleShare free access
President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia sitting at a table in a dark suit. He is holding papers.

“Despite Mr. Putin’s words, we have seen no actions to indicate he is interested in ending this war,” a National Security Council spokesman said of President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia.Credit…Alexander Kazakov/Sputnik

The Biden administration dismissed on Friday a call by President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia for negotiations to end the war in Ukraine, showing no sign that flagging political support for American military aid to Kyiv had made President Biden more inclined to make concessions to Moscow.

During his two-hour interview at the Kremlin with the former Fox News host Tucker Carlson, who now broadcasts independently online, Mr. Putin offered long defenses of his invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 but said he was prepared to settle the conflict diplomatically.

“We are willing to negotiate,” Mr. Putin told Mr. Carlson in the interview, which was released on Thursday. “You should tell the current Ukrainian leadership to stop and come to the negotiating table,” he added, referring to the U.S. government.

The Russian leader spoke at a moment of apparent leverage, following the failure of a vaunted Ukrainian summer counteroffensive to achieve substantial gains and as the Biden administration is struggling to win congressional approval for desperately needed additional military aid for Kyiv.

It is not the first time Mr. Putin has expressed willingness to negotiate over the fate of Ukraine, and Western officials have long been skeptical of his intentions. But because it was his first interview with an American media figure since the invasion, his call for talks has extra resonance, analysts said.

U.S. and Ukrainian officials say that the best Ukraine’s military can hope for in the coming year, especially without more American aid, is to defend its current positions. Even so, Biden officials say they are not entertaining the idea of pressing Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, to negotiate with Mr. Putin.

“Both we and President Zelensky have said numerous times that we believe this war will end through negotiations,” a National Security Council spokesman said in a statement. “Despite Mr. Putin’s words, we have seen no actions to indicate he is interested in ending this war. If he was, he would pull back his forces and stop his ceaseless attacks on Ukraine.”

U.S. officials had previously assessed that Mr. Putin had no intention of negotiating seriously until after the U.S. presidential election in November. Mr. Putin, they say, wants to wait to see whether former President Donald J. Trump might return to the White House and offer him more favorable terms.

Mr. Putin’s interview with Tucker Carlson was the Russian president’s first with an American journalist since the invasion of Ukraine.Credit…Rebecca Noble for The New York Times

In an interview last spring, Mr. Trump said the “horrible” conflict in Ukraine must come to an immediate end and that if re-elected, he would broker a deal to “end that war in one day.”

The Biden administration has supported Ukraine’s stated desire to reclaim territory that Russia has occupied since its invasion. Russia now occupies around 18 percent of Ukrainian land.

U.S. officials have also long insisted that, despite the more than $75 billion in aid the United States has supplied to Ukraine, it is not for Washington to dictate whether Kyiv engages in peace talks and what on terms. “Ultimately, it’s up to Ukraine to decide its path on negotiations,” the National Security Council statement said.

Many analysts were also skeptical of Mr. Putin’s intentions. Sergey Radchenko, a Russia historian at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, said Mr. Putin should not be trusted.

Mr. Radchenko said Mr. Putin might be engaging in what during Soviet times was known as a “peace offensive” — an insincere tactical feint whose goal, he said, was “to present a reasonable face to the outside world: ‘Oh yeah, of course we want peace — it’s just the other side that doesn’t want to talk.’”

Some Western officials believe Mr. Putin may also have his domestic audience in mind when he talks about a negotiated end to the war. Polls in Russia have shown that Russian citizens would welcome a settlement to end the conflict that has shaken their economy and produced tens of thousands of casualties.

Talk of peace could also win Mr. Putin favor among nations in the so-called global south — nations in South America, Asia and Africa, including India and South Africa, that are unaligned in the Ukraine conflict. Most of those countries have suffered from higher energy and food prices caused by the war.

Mr. Putin seemed to be exploiting Republican opposition to Mr. Biden’s funding request for Ukraine, echoing critiques made in recent weeks by some conservative members of Congress. “You have issues on the border, issues with migration, issues with the national debt — more than $33 trillion. You have nothing better to do, so you should fight in Ukraine?” Mr. Putin asked.

Alternatively, Mr. Radchenko said, Mr. Putin might be willing to make some unexpected concessions for a peace deal that leaves Russia with a foothold in eastern Ukraine, “and then use that as a basis for either further aggression against Ukraine, or as leverage to force a preferred government on Ukraine.”

Samuel Charap, a Russia analyst at the RAND Corporation, said it was possible that Mr. Putin had been bluffing all along about talks. But he said it was worth engaging the Kremlin in private to determine Mr. Putin’s actual demands.

“Nobody knows for sure — and nobody can know for sure unless they try,” Mr. Charap said. He added that it was notable that Mr. Putin had not told Mr. Carlson that he had preconditions for talks, such as the removal of Mr. Zelensky’s government.

Mr. Charap also noted that Russia and Ukraine were already negotiating on a number of matters, including prisoner-of-war swaps and Ukrainian exports from its Black Sea ports.

Regardless of Mr. Putin’s intentions, analysts and Western officials say that a major obstacle to potential talks is the unwillingness of Ukraine’s public to compromise with an invader that has committed atrocities in their country.

“Zelensky is worried about the domestic political consequences of pursuing a different tactic,” Mr. Charap said.

“Barring a Ukrainian demand signal” for peace talks, “there’s unlikely to be a push from Washington,” he said.

Michael Crowley covers the State Department and U.S. foreign policy for The Times. He has reported from nearly three dozen countries and often travels with the secretary of state. More about Michael Crowley

A version of this article appears in print on  , Section A, Page 9 of the New York edition with the headline: U.S. Rejects Russia’s Latest Request for Talks on War. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe
  • Share full articleShare free access
Categories
(@mikenov) / Twitter

@mikenov: U.S. Rejects Putin’s Latest Call for Ukraine Negotiations – The New York Times https://t.co/DwW8k9avw7

Categories
(@mikenov) / Twitter

@mikenov: Azerbaijan Must Show a Victor’s Wisdom – CEPA https://t.co/HftcidGS9d – South Caucasus #SouthCaucasus https://t.co/NE6AkDPvai

Categories
Saved web pages

Former CIA analyst issues warning to Zelensky

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky‘s firing of his commander-in-chief Valerii Zaluzhny is fraught with risk, a former CIA director has said, amid divided opinion over the wisdom of the decision and its impact on Kyiv’s fight against Russia.

Tensions in the relationship between the pair had been reported in recent months. It intensified after Zaluzhny told U.K. publication The Economist in November, after a lack of success in Kyiv’s counteroffensive, that the war had reached a “stalemate”—an assessment that was rejected by Zelensky days later.

After much speculation, Zelensky announced on Thursday that Zaluzhny would be replaced by Oleksandr Syrsky, who has served as the Commander of Ukrainian Land Forces since 2019. The Ukrainian president said that “everyone must change and adapt to the new realities.” Newsweek emailed the Ukrainian Defense Ministry for comment on Saturday.

While there might be broad agreement domestically and among Kyiv’s allies with Zelensky’s assessment that the war’s tasks in 2022 when it started are different from those of 2024, the president’s decision is seen as having political reasons—as well as consequences.

George Beebe is a former director of Russia analysis at the CIA and ex-staff adviser to former Vice President Dick Cheney on Russian affairs from 2002 to 2004). He told Newsweek in emailed comments that the Zaluzhny decision could “erupt into a broader Ukrainian political crisis,” especially given the general’s popularity.

A poll in December by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology (KIIS) found that Ukrainians’ trust in Zelensky had declined from 84 percent at the end of 2022 to 62 percent a year later, while 88 percent said they trusted Zaluzhny.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky addresses the assembly at the World Economic Forum (WEF) annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland, on January 16, 2024. His announcement on February 8, 2024 that he had fired his commander-in-chief Valerii…
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky addresses the assembly at the World Economic Forum (WEF) annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland, on January 16, 2024. His announcement on February 8, 2024 that he had fired his commander-in-chief Valerii Zaluzhny has divided opinion. FABRICE COFFRINI/Getty Images

“Firing the military’s senior command in wartime is a sign of failure. It is something that states do when they are losing, not winning,” said Beebe, director of grand strategy at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft.

“Zelensky’s move is fraught with risk,” he added. “No new commander or tranche of military aid can reverse the difficult truth—Ukraine lacks the manpower, weapons and economic capacity to sustain a prolonged war of attrition against Russia.

“U.S. aid for Ukraine’s defense should continue in order to prevent a Ukrainian collapse and give Kyiv the best-possible hand at the negotiating table,” Beebe said.

Meanwhile, in an op-ed for the Carnegie Institute, Konstantin Skorkin, an independent researcher on the Donbas region, said that Zelensky was taking a major risk in replacing his commander-in-chief.

“Never before has he so blatantly defied the public consensus for the sake of his own political survival,” Skorkin wrote in the piece published Saturday.

However, U.S. Retired Vice Admiral Robert Murrett, professor of practice at Syracuse University’s Maxwell School in New York, told Newsweek that the shift in Ukrainian senior leadership “reflects a logical transition following two years of a country on a wartime footing.”

“This may be time for new approaches and positioning for adopting a long-term posture which would increase pressure on Russia, and demonstrate resolution and stamina to other international actors as well as the people of Ukraine,” Murrett said.

In his first public statement since his appointment, Syrsky said on Telegram that his priorities would be detailed planning of the actions of all military command bodies, units, and formations and solving issues with logistics and troop rotations.

Since Russia’s full-scale invasion, Syrsky has been credited with the defense of Kyiv from February to March 2022 and the counteroffensive in the summer and fall of 2022 that drove the Russians out of the Kharkiv region.

The new commander-in-chief is likely to act in line with the president’s wishes on drafting troops. “Zelensky badly wanted to shift responsibility for mobilization onto the military, and Syrsky will most likely take on the role of ‘bad cop’ in this situation,” wrote Skorkin.

Newsweek is committed to challenging conventional wisdom and finding connections in the search for common ground.

Newsweek is committed to challenging conventional wisdom and finding connections in the search for common ground.